When we engage unbelievers, being salt and light we are engaging in spiritual battle and they are wanting and expecting a
“Bible free zone” of apologetic in the public square. It goes something like “You
can’t argue from the Bible because I don’t believe the Bible, so we must debate
on common ground of what I consider to be good sound reason.” They want you to give up your starting point
but they get to keep theirs. You must abandon your worldview and engage their
worldview FROM their worldview. They borrow Christian terms like “right” and “wrong”
and “good” and “evil” that can only exist with a standard of right and wrong
and good and evil. And if there is standard, where did that come from and why?
Let’s imagine you are awakened from dreaming about living in a
free Republic to find you are being robbed. As a vigilant citizen you reach for
your Smith & Wesson and proceed to engage the lawless and disobedient. Full
of good courage, you play the man and catch the thief with his arms hugging your
television. When confronted with superior firepower he says with a furrow of anxiety upon the brow “I don’t
believe in the right of a man to defend his home with a gun. I think this ought
to be a gun free zone.” Would you reply “Oh, yes, certainly - allow me to
holster my gun, since you don’t believe in it, and we will get on common
ground.”
What has happened? You have conceded to his presuppositions.
You have laid down your weapon because he doesn't like you having it or doesn't want you to use it. He may genuinely not like it and not believe in it – but should
that stop you from using it? The believer
who attempts to argue apart from scripture has conceded that the unbeliever
somehow is coming from a neutral position. You believe in the authority of God’s
Word. He disagrees, but be sure he is not coming from an unbiased position.
If a person denies that the Bible is living and
powerful, does that make it not so? Is the Bible quick and powerful regardless
of what a person thinks about it? When we engage unbelievers who do not want to
concede that God’s Word is truth, don’t voluntarily turn in your Sword to the
proper authorities, who happen to have weapons of their own. I believe in
divinely inspired Word of God. This leads to the next reason - since the Bible
is divinely inspired, it is authoritative and I must bow the knee to God’s
Word. And, as if I planned it this way, leads to a thirdly - I believe the Bible
to be supernatural in power and sharper than any two-edged sword. That the Bible
gets down to the meat & bones of the matter and discerns your thoughts and
intentions. It is a powerful, spiritual weapon and our only weapon. Thus when engaging
in spiritual warfare, don’t turn the debate into a Bible free zone.