An
eye for an eye
is one of those Biblical phrases that has worked itself into the common
lexicon. It’s a striking phrase (and a little horrifying if you think about it
being carried out). Usually associated with Old Testament justice it’s commonly
understood as a harsh, ungracious attitude of revenge contrary to the love and
grace of the New Testament. This was the view in our Lord’s day too. But, an
eye for an eye is not a call to vigilante justice or cold-blooded revenge, but
a law of equitable justice (Deuteronomy 19, Exodus 21:24 and Leviticus 24:20).
In the context of the book of Leviticus 24, starting in verse 13, justice was
handed out by judges and the whole congregation. Here, the death penalty is
prescribed for blasphemy and murder. But if a man killed another man’s beast,
the law demanded the man provide the value of the beast he killed. If someone
caused a blemish, the penalty was a blemish. I don’t live in ancient Israel,
and neither do you, so we do not follow the laws of that country in this
country. However, the principle of the law is just and we still follow the attitude
of an eye for an eye.
An
eye for an eye was never about revenge, but equal justice. The punishment needs
to fit the crime. If a boy throws a ball through the neighbor's window, a just
penalty would be to have window to be replaced. It’s not justice to have the
boy beheaded. It’s not justice to have all new windows installed in every room
of the house. An eye for an eye, a window for a window. If someone damages your
property, you didn’t win the lottery and you don’t get to wring every penny out
of the person for “emotional damage”. The wrongdoer should put things back, as
best they can. If you murder, the penalty will be stiff; life for life. But you
shouldn’t be executed for backing over your neighbor’s mailbox. If you do
something wrong, make it right, as best you can. If you break a borrowed tool,
replace it with one of equal or greater value. If someone breaks your “Made in
China” hammer, don’t demand they upgrade to something you wouldn’t have spent
the cash on yourself. The Old Testament system was actually quite just. An eye
for an eye is the opposite of selfish revenge and vindictiveness. Jesus
explains its true meaning by teaching that we are to turn the other cheek, go
the extra mile, give of our self and our time (Matthew 5:38-42). This passage
is not about defending our rights but giving them up. Laying aside what is
technically our right for the furtherance of the gospel and the kingdom. Jesus
made a whip and ran the money changers out of the temple when the glory of God was
defamed, but when he was reviled, he reviled not again. Follow Jesus' example
in fulfilling this law (1 Peter 2:21-25).
No comments:
Post a Comment